About Vishvapani Blomfield

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Vishvapani Blomfield has created 4 blog entries.

At Least

About ten years ago a young Muslim woman called Abeer Ameer came on a mindfulness course I taught at the Cardiff Buddhist Centre. She wore a hijab and was very quiet and modest in demeanour. She was researching whether mindfulness could help her anxious patients (she worked as a dentist.)

After the course she and a friend came to see me for a private session. Abeer wanted to explore one of the themes the course had touched in her. Having learned to settle the mind and tune in to the body, we ask participants to turn their attention towards difficult aspects of their experience. The principle, which Buddhist thought shares with cognitive psychology, is that behind problems like stress, anxiety or anger often lie unaddressed feelings of pain or upset. Healing comes when we allow ourselves to turn towards those feelings and experience their full emotional truth.

No doubt that’s helpful when a dentist is drilling a hole in your tooth; but it also spoke to something much more personal in Abeer. She found herself turning towards the shadows in her own life, and, a little later, she told me she’d started creative writing classes. She’d never written before but now poems were pouring out.

A couple of years ago Abeer gave me her first collection, Inhale/Exhale. The poems tell the story of her parents’ lives in Iraq under Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship. They describe what they suffered, why they left, and Abeer’s experience of growing up in the UK in a refugee family. The strongest poems evoke both the beauty of ordinary life and the terrible impact of fear and political violence. Their strength is that they do so calmly, with neither anger nor hyperbole.

This was around the time of the October 7th attacks in Israel, and I told Abeer that, as a person of Jewish descent, I felt I too had been attacked. My father came to Britain as a Kindertransport boy, fleeing the Nazis, so I had also grown up in a refugee family. Many people were saying that the attacks were an echo of the Holocaust, and I also felt that myself. But I also dreaded what would come next for the inhabitants of Gaza.

As the war in Gaza unfolded I was barely able to follow the events; they were too upsetting. Like many of my Jewish friends, I found myself in the state Buddhist psychology calls ‘horrified anxiety’: emotionally affected, but not knowing what to do or say. Perhaps the most upsetting part was hearing people defend Israeli actions in Gaza by invoking the Holocaust.

Meanwhile, Abeer wrote poem after poem about the war. Some were angry, but many simply described casualties with her characteristic calm, reinforcing their message with quiet understatement and irony.

Last month, one of these poems, entitled ‘At Least’, was named Best Single Poem in the Forward poetry prize, the UK’s leading poetry award. It ends:

at least/ now they’re just waiting/ for a proper burial/ at least/
at least/ it’s over now/ at least/ for the dead/
at least/ these children/ don’t need to fear the dark/
at least/ not anymore/

The poem is devastatingly restrained, evoking a truth by evading it and quietly echoing our own evasions. I would never have guessed, when I first met her, that such grandeur waited within Abeer.

Now the focus has shifted to Iran. First, the country’s ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ uprising echoed Abeer’s stand, but the protests were brutally repressed. Now American and Israeli bombs are killing Iran’s leaders and protesters alike. The context is different, but the lesson for those of us who are looking on is the same.

My father learned from his traumatised childhood that when we suffer we have a choice: We can react with blame and anger or we can vow ‘Never again’. Facing our pain creates the space for another response: compassion – recognising that others suffer as we do and feeling moved to respond.

I don’t know what I believe about many things in the world. There is no end to my ignorance and confusion. But I do believe this: that our humanity calls us to turn towards the whole truth, irrespective of our sectarian allegiances, and however hard that may be for all of us to face.

At Least2026-04-02T21:36:21+01:00

Circling the Buddha

Arriving at the pilgrimage site in Bodh Gaya, where the Buddha gained Enlightenment, you deposit your shoes and phone and walk down to the Burmese Mahabodhi Temple. There, you can queue to visit the shrine at the temple’s base or join the stream of pilgrims walking around it. Thais and Burmese circle the building all day, led by yellow-robed bhikkhus reciting ancient Pāli chants, while Koreans, Taiwanese and Vietnamese make the circuit in large groups, and Himalayan Buddhists murmur mantras, or proceed around the Temple prostration by prostration.

Traditional accounts relate that, shortly before he died, the Buddha instructed his disciples to build monuments known as stupas in the places where he was born, gained Enlightenment, gave his first teaching and passed away. He said that visiting these sites would ‘inspire confidence’ in his followers when he was no longer physically present. In time, many more stupas were constructed across India and Asia – some as simple as a Celtic burial mound, others including a range of symbol-laden features. Everywhere, Buddhists circumambulate stupas and temples – the practice of pradakshina, as it is known in Sanskrit, or ‘making kora’ as the Tibetans say – always walking clockwise and keeping the monument on their right. I’ve just returned from leading a pilgrimage to the Buddhist holy sites in India and Nepal, and in each place we joined the flow of pilgrims and felt the surprising power of circumambulation.

Walking around a monument differs fundamentally from marching ‘from A to B’ or from wandering aimlessly. The aim is simply to circumambulate, and in doing so to find oneself in relationship with the stupa and what it represents. In Sarnath, where the Buddha delivered his first teaching following his Enlightenment, a sturdy and distinctive stupa survives from ancient times – its mound and shaft oddly resembling the shape that obsesses the characters in Close Encounters. Its massive presence drew me towards it, and suggested a powerful symbol of the Buddha, whom it commemorates, and his Enlightenment, which it symbolises. To circumambulate is therefore to make Enlightenment, or Buddhahood, the centre of one’s focus and one’s relationship with it.

Since my return, the image of circumambulation has come to me in meditation. When my attention scurries after the thoughts that arise, the image of the stupa and its massive presence draws me back to the path encircling it. I associate that with what Buddhists call going for refuge – the act of placing the Buddha, his teaching and his community at the centre of one’s life. And I feel myself stepping back onto the pradakshina path and finding that I am not alone. I have joined the long stream of pilgrims who have trodden the path in the past, experience it in the present, and will discover it in the future, all of us circling the Buddha, feeling what he means of for our lives, forever making kora.

Vishvapani Blomfield

Circling the Buddha2025-03-08T19:26:50+00:00

Dewi Sant

The cycle route from my house into Cardiff takes me past Llandaff Cathedral, and sometimes through its grounds. It was built in the twelfth century on a site at least five hundred years older. Though its scale is grand, its setting is modest: out of sight at the base of the hill, in a dip close to the River Taff and surrounded by trees. Passing through, I recall Philip Larkin’s feeling in the poem Church Going, that ’It pleases me to stand in silence here.’

Those moments in the Cathedral grounds, when I feel that I am brushing past something ancient and deep-rooted, remind me of the many ways in which geography can be mapped into the psyche. Every landscape is imbued with invisible meanings that come from the generations who have previously inhabited it. Our relation to the land depends on our relation to those generations and their sources of meaning.

The desire to inhabit a sacred landscape also reminds me of the fascination with Tibet as a place, which is so important for many western followers of Tibetan Buddhism. The German Buddhist, Lama Govinda, writes in his memoir, The Way of the White Clouds:

Tibet has become the symbol of all that present-day humanity is longing for … the stability of a tradition, which has its roots not only in a historical or cultural past, but within the innermost being of man, in whose depth this past is enshrined as an ever-present source of inspiration.

This thought resonates more strongly in some places than in others. I was born in Croydon, a dismal London suburb where any sense of ancient sanctity has been buried beneath concrete, and whose sole river, the Wandle, is for most of its course culverted like a sewer. I moved from England to Wales to marry a Welshwoman, and the difference is palpable – bound up with the land, the people, the stories they tell and, for many, the language. Though North Waleans would deny it, that’s even true in Cardiff.

I have learned to love the distinctive character of Welshness. I feel it keenly when we go on holiday to Pembrokeshire, even among the well-heeled visitors from the cities who come for a summer of sailing and paddleboards. Between the Preseli Hills and Cardigan Bay, the place has an Atlantic starkness and the same sense that following its paths means stepping upon layers of memory. The cathedral town of St Davids is on the west coast, facing the ocean. That is where the eponymous Dewi Sant lived in the sixth century. I enjoy the story that David founded a monastic order whose members pulled the plough themselves and usually ate only bread with salt and herbs.

The daffodil and leek lapel-badges you see on St David’s day are emblems of something half-remembered. In this country we cannot help stepping on the past, or into a space where things that were once powerfully alive persist and continue to surprise us. At the end of Church Going Larkin recognizes the significance of the place into which he has stumbled:

A serious house on serious earth it is,
In whose blent air all our compulsions meet,
Are recognised, and robed as destinies.

As well as the literal space of a physical church there is the figurative space of our consciousness. When I think of Larkin’s lines I also think of my favourite poem by Wallace Stevens, The Final Ballad of the Interior Paramour, which describes an encounter within this inner space:

Here, now, we forget each other and ourselves.
We feel the obscurity of an order, a whole,
A knowledge, that which arranged the rendezvous

Within its vital boundary, in the mind.
We say God and the imagination are one…
How high that highest candle lights the dark.

Happy St David’s Day! Dydd Gŵyl Dewi Hapus!

Dewi Sant2026-03-16T14:28:58+00:00

Thoughts about Thoughts

It could be a parlour game. You have all the day’s news in front of you and two minutes forty five seconds to make a Buddhist comment on it. You can deviate and hesitate, but not repeat yourself. You have to be relevant and you can’t be sectarian or party political. Several million people will hear your talk, so it’s a good idea to avoid being platitudinous.

Since 2006 I’ve been the Buddhist contributor to Thought for the Day on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme – a venerable institution which has some people spluttering into their muesli and others taking the opportunity to head to the loo. A surprising number of people actually like it.

At a steady ten talks a year (plus others I do in a similar format for BBC Radio Wales), I’ve learned how to play this game. To connect the news with the Buddha’s teachings you have to draw out a general ethical or doctrinal reflection from the specific story. If the transition is too abrupt or the faith comment seems to leave behind the problem in the news, the result is platitude. But if the ‘thought’ is sufficiently resonant, it can add something to the discussion, even if it doesn’t offer a solution. When the Queen died I spoke about impermanence; when war broke out in the Ukraine I recounted a discussion with fellow Buddhists about what our non-violent ideals meant in the face of a brutal attack.

This raises a larger question: What does Buddhism have to say to modern society? One view is that it teaches leaving the world behind, not changing it. I don’t think that was true for the Buddha in his society and I don’t think it’s true now. Another is that the forces shaping the world institutionalise craving, aversion and ignorance and a Buddhist position should oppose them. I sympathise, but in practice, I observe that, while this approach will give you a left-wing perspective, it’s much less clear that it brings a distinctively Buddhist one?

For a long time the limit on expressing my personal opinions felt like a constraint, but over time they have helped me clarify for me what I think Buddhism really has to offer. In particular, I’ve found that some themes, which are central to the Dharma, also resonate strongly with the issues facing our society.

One is the central place that Buddhism affords to the mind. The rising incidence of stress and mental health problems make understanding and ‘managing’ our minds a pressing issue for many people. And in the world of the ‘attention economy’ Buddhist practices, perhaps mediated by the Mindfulness Movement, are directly relevant.

The same is true, in a consumerist society furiously dedicated to consumption and distraction, of everything Buddhism has to say about non-material sources of satisfaction.  Similarly, Buddhist teachings on universal loving kindness, or metta, are relevant to compassionate activity wherever it happens, and to issues of war and peace. They are also relevant to chauvinism and racism, even when they occur in Buddhist countries. Finally, the Buddhist teachings on karma or conditionality imply the need to take a long-term, holistic perspective on the world; that’s the opposite of the short-term, instrumental approaches that have brought so many problems, and it’s the key to the Buddhist response to climate change.

This isn’t a comprehensive list – I talk about many other things as well. It also isn’t a systematic Buddhist political philosophy, and I suspect that such a thing isn’t even possible. My criteria are that what I say should align with core Buddhist teachings and connect with wider needs; I also need to feel a connection with it that comes from my own experience and Buddhist practice.

Beyond the parlour game and the broadcasting, I suspect that what I’ve learned from doing Thought for the Day is relevant for other people of faith. In a fractious, polarised political culture where people are losing the capacity to listen, the world doesn’t need us to take sides. It needs us to listen, and offer an alternative.

VISHVAPANI BLOMFIELD

Thoughts about Thoughts2025-06-07T05:35:17+01:00